Timber and furniture
DOF cross-referenced against NF-e for Lacey Act readiness, plus CAR, deforestation and embargoes.
- CAR — registration status
- Deforestation (INPE PRODES + DETER)
- IBAMA embargoes
- Lacey Act readiness (DOF×NF-e)
- CNPJ registration status
- Federal sanctions (CEIS/CNEP)
The critical point: the US Lacey Act
For timber and furniture entering the United States, the critical point is the Lacey Act. Form PPQ 505/505B requires the scientific species name — genus and species in Latin — and the Brazilian DOF (Forest Origin Document) frequently does not carry it in full. The trade name appears (“ipê”, “cumaru”), but the exact scientific name that resolves ambiguity between species sharing a popular name often does not.
We cross-reference the DOF against the NF-e for the timber movement and flag specifically where the scientific name is absent — before it becomes a problem at US customs clearance, rather than after, when the shipment is already held.
For shipments into the EU
Timber and derived products are also covered by the EUDR. As with any chain involving a rural property of origin, CAR, deforestation (INPE PRODES and DETER) and IBAMA embargoes are monitored as normal. The same evidence base supports both requirements, with the difference that the EUDR centres on deforestation while the Lacey Act centres on legality of species origin.
Why the DOF alone does not settle it
The DOF authorises transport, but there is no public API to validate one in real time — IBAMA’s only official lookup is captcha-protected with no programmatic endpoint. In practice the DOF is a document taken on the supplier’s word, exactly as the GTA is for cattle. Cross-referencing against the NF-e, which has independent fiscal origin, is what adds confidence.